Wednesday 30 January 2013

Timgad vs. Pikillacta

Ancient ruins found throughout the world can be seen as a glimpse into past. The architecture found in these locations is evidence of empire conquests and colonization. This week’s post looks at the similarities and differences between two archeological sites, the Roman colonial center of Thamugadi (Timgad) and the Wari military center of Pikillacta. Using digital maps and web-based content, I will explore each of the built forms and reflect on their empire’s cultural and societal values.
Timgad, the royal ruins of Algeria, was created as a military colony under the rule of Emperor Trajan. In contrast to the organic site up of Rome, this colonized region depicts precise planning of the land into clearly defined spaces by the Romans. This was meant to show the need to be one unified group under Roman authority. The symmetry of the grid layout represents order, stability, and permanence. Over time, the region of Timgad evolved from being a military camp to being a place that also catered to public assemblies and religious practices. Viewing a map of Timgad, one can see typical Roman buildings such as a Forum in the main hub of the city with important commercial and civic buildings around it. Other buildings like theatres and baths were located nearby followed by residential housing of the lower class in the outer perimeter.
 
 
 
 
Similar to Timgad, the Wari military center of Pikillacta, which is now located in modern Peru, spanned a large area featuring a similar grid system. This grid system can be subdivided into four sectors that appear to be similar to how Wari architectures divided their land at that time.  Each sector possessed its own unique rectangular compounds. Additionally, similar to Timgad, the large rectangular enclosure of Pikillacta contained structures that were also organized on a hierarchy of space. Both Timgad and Pikillacta also exhibited uneven terrains so great effort was made to keep the grid system symmetrical.
 
 

 
Pikillacta.


 
Pikillacta.
 
On the other hand, the main difference between Timgad and Pikillacta was that little artifacts and written records from the Wari culture of Pikillacta were found. It is still uncertain whether the buildings in Pikillacta could have been used for residential purposes as well. Therefore, the use of information from other similar cultures had to be used to hypothesize about the possible culture and structure of the Wari empire.  
 
 
 
Work Cited
McEwan, Gordon F., and Nicole Couture. Pikillacta: The Wari Empire in Cuzco. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press, 2005.
 
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Timgad. http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/194.
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment